Putin regime subjects political prisoners to increasing brutality as war wears on
Statement by the Boris Kagarlitsky International Solidarity Campaign 14 June 2026
Conditions for political prisoners in the Russian Federation and the territories it occupies have deteriorated sharply with the prolongation of the war on Ukraine.
Those accused and convicted of weakening the war effort under an assortment of fabricated charges are receiving longer sentences, detainees are being rearrested to prolong their prison time, there are accounts of sleep and food deprivation, and torture is routine.
Most recently, the abysmal treatment of mathematician Azat Miftakhov has been brought to international attention. Detained since 2019 on a series of trumped-up charges, including hooliganism and justifying terrorism, he is currently confined to a high-security prison in the Arctic Circle (Kharp, IK-18).
According to direct testimony on April 21, 2026, Azat was subjected to atrocious physical and psychological abuses designed to break his will. He was force stripped, bound, suffocated, beaten repeatedly, shocked with electric current, and sexually violated.
Miftakhov’s case, and that of Bakhrom Khamroyev, also held in Kharp, are among those confirming a disturbing deterioration in the conditions faced by men and women jailed and persecuted for expressing opposition to the war. Six political prisoners, ranging in age from 43 to 65, died in Russian state custody in the first four months of 2026 alone.
Already in fall of 2024, Mariana Katzarova, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Russian Federation, reported that “torture is used as a State sanctioned tool for systematic oppression, to maintain control and to stifle dissent.”
The gross mistreatment of political prisoners, who number in the thousands, has gone had in hand with an intensification of internal repression by the Putin regime, which, in turn, is expanding the prison population both in Russia and in the territories it occupies. Ukrainian civilians held as prisoners are also among the Kremlin’s victims.
“The net of repression is being cast wider than it was in the first year of the war, in response to the fear of growing internal resistance, and any pretext will do, explained exiled Russian journalist and antiwar activist Alexey Sakhnin. “ ‘Extremism’ can mean criticism of the government; ‘Terrorism’ can mean discussing political texts.”
Moreover, according to Sakhnin, the focus of repression has shifted from middle-class political activists to a broader swath of the population, encompassing the working class and the poor, who are increasingly discontent with the protracted war and the deteriorating social conditions it is producing.
By mid-2025, according to the Re: Russia network, the number of politically motivated convictions on political charges had increased by 80 percent compared with 2024. More young people, including minors, are also being arrested, tried and convicted, notably the young anti-war activists in the so-called Vesna case and the group of poets found guilty of “fomenting hatred”.
The Boris Kagarlitsky International Solidarity Campaign is extremely concerned about the implications of these disturbing developments for Boris Kagarlitsky himself, who remains in prison, having served over two years of the five-year sentence unjustly meted out to him by a military court for a sarcastic remark he made in 2022 about the Crimean bridge explosion (“justification of terrorism” in the eyes of Russian law).
We also fear for the welfare of all the other prisoners subjected to the brutal conditions of the Russian penal system and we urge closer collaboration among all organisations defending their rights with a view to increasing the political pressure on the Putin regime as much as humanly possible.
For further information: (North America) Andrea Levy +1 514 433 7890 (Europe) Dick Nichols +34 683 171 461
https://freeboris.info/
Back
|
|
|
Thanks for visting the G20 From Below Website. If you want something published here or other enquiries mailto:Brics-from-below@protonmail.com
Please Visit the BRICs from below website. The BRICs from below website was established in 2016 to news and analysis on worker and community protests in the BRICS countries and against the activities of BRICS based multinationals especially in Africa. The G20From Below website was set up in to 2025 to extened this work to the G20 countries.
Introducing BRICS from above, BRICS from the middle and BRICS from below
BRICS FROM ABOVE
Heads of state, Business Forum, elite allies
*BRICS as anti-imperialist (ANC & Pretoria rhetoric – “Talk Left, Walk Right”, e.g. national-liberation tradition, foreign ministry on global geopolitics, finance minister on IMF reform, sports minister on FIFA)
*BRICS as sub-imperialist (Pretoria relegitimising world capitalism, lubricating neoliberalism in - and exploiting - Africa, intensifying class war against SA’s poor/workers/women/nature on behalf of global/local capital, ensuring maximum greenhouse gas emissions alongside BASIC/US no matter local/continental/global consequences, and playing “deputy sheriff” role to imperialism)
*BRICS as inter-imperialist (Pretoria's potential support for a new internet delinked from US, promotion of Putin v Obama in September 2013 at G20, and mainly backing Russia in Crimea/Ukraine conflict - as well as earlier episodes where SA lined up with China in UN e.g. in relation to Burma)
BRICS FROM THE MIDDLE
Academic Forum, trade unions, NGOs
BRICS advocates (most of Academic Forum, Johannesburg & Pretoria “think tanks” and others who suffer persistent “failure of analytical nerve”)
*wait-and-see (most NGOs and trade unions - as well as “Third Worldist” intellectuals - who wish for BRICS to become “anti-impi” at UN, Bretton Woods Institutions, Development Bank, Contingent Reserve Arrangement, etc)
*critics (those associated with brics-from-below network who consider BRICS to be “sub-impis” and sometimes also “inter-impis”)
BRICS FROM BELOW
Grassroots activists whose visions run local to global
*localist (stuck within local or sectoral silos, including myriad “popcorn protests” - even some against BRICS corporations or projects - that are insurgent, unstrategic, momentary, at constant risk of becoming xenophobic, and prone to populist demagoguery)
*nationally-bound (most activists who are vaguely aware of - and hostile to - BRICS yet so overwhelmed by local, national and sectoral battles, they fail to link across borders - even BRICS hinterlands)
*solidaristic-internationalist (“global justice movement” allies aspiring for joint campaigning against common BRICS enemies such as Vale, China Development Bank, DBSA, Transnet/mega-shipping, fossil fuel corporations and other polluters, coming BRICS Development Bank)
JEALOUS PRO-WEST CAPITALISTS
Most white organic intellectuals of capital connected to Old Money, multinational-corporate branch plants, Business Day, northern-centric big biz, Democratic Alliance and their ilk.
|
